Two Analysts Break Down What the Canadiens Lost with Sean Monahan's Departure
We had an interesting discussion involving former Montreal Canadiens forward Sean Monahan.
A debate between sports analysts Martin Lemay and Mathias Brunet on the show Le Retour des Sportifs highlighted differing perspectives on the impact of Sean Monahan's departure from the Montreal Canadiens.
An interesting discussion about Sean Monahan's return to Montreal between Martin Lemay and Mathias Brunet: Would it have benefited the Canadiens?
For Mathias Brunet, while Monahan delivered solid performances, signing him long-term wouldn't have been ideal. He preferred that the Canadiens maintain financial flexibility for other investments.
He pointed out that a long-term contract worth $5.5 million would have posed a risk, especially for a team in a current rebuild and looking for stability.
Martin Lemay, on the other hand, took a different approach, asserting that the Canadiens need quality players and that someone like Monahan, both versatile and experienced, would have provided long-term advantages, even with an expensive contract.
Lemay argued that adding Monahan to the lineup could have offered valuable depth at center and that his presence would have strengthened the team's leadership.
This debate raises a fundamental question for fans: should the Canadiens prioritize financial prudence, or retain talented players, even at the expense of heavier contracts?
One thing is certain: Monahan is having a stellar start to the season with the Columbus Blue Jackets and would be highly useful to the Montreal Canadiens at this time.
Monahan, 30, has scored 11 points in 12 games this season.
He signed a $5.5 million per year contract, valid until 2029.
| POLL | ||
Do you think the Canadiens should have kept Sean Monahan? | ||
