Before the game against his former team, Laine made remarks that were not well-received, particularly by Zach Werenski, a leader of the Blue Jackets.
During the game, Laine left after the first period, intensifying the discussions afterward.
Mathias Brunet, a columnist for BPM Sports, stated that the Finnish player should have avoided making such comments, especially before facing his former club.
According to Brunet, these remarks served to motivate the opponent, a point also highlighted by Anthony Marcotte and Renaud Lavoie.
The timing of his comments was deemed inappropriate.
Unlike Don Waddell, who recently criticized the organization, Laine was a key player for the Blue Jackets during their tough times.
This makes his criticisms feel more personal, explaining the reaction of his former teammates.
Given this tense context, Laine's health status becomes the next question. Is it a serious injury or merely a precaution by the Canadiens to protect him?
Answers may take time, as the Canadiens don't play again for several days.
If he can learn from this lesson, Laine will need to measure his words carefully to avoid generating unnecessary controversies.
Do you personally believe Laine missed a good opportunity to stay quiet?
For now, here's what we know about his upper-body injury:
POLL | ||
DECEMBRE 26 | 2328 ANSWERS Mathias Brunet Makes a Big Statement on Patrik Laine, and There's an Update on His Injury Was Patrik Laine wrong to criticize his former team right before the game? | ||
Yes, it was unnecessary | 1859 | 79.9 % |
No | 469 | 20.1 % |
List of polls |